What source-of-funds checks are trying to confirm
A source-of-funds check is about the origin of the money used for gambling or held in an account. In practical terms, the requester is looking for evidence that the money came from a lawful and understandable source, such as earnings, savings, a bank transfer you can explain, or another documented inflow. A balance figure alone does not show that story. That is why a statement is usually more useful than a single screenshot, because it shows the movement of money over time.
For this page, think of the task as building a short paper trail. Your decision checklist is simple: can you explain where the money first came from, can you point to the transaction that brought it into Revolut, and can the dates and amounts line up with the request? If any part is missing, that is a sign to pause and check what extra document the casino or financial business wants. The related page title How to check a UK casino licence is useful if you also want to confirm you are dealing with a properly licensed operator.
Revolut statements versus balance screenshots
A Revolut statement is usually stronger than a screenshot because it can show account activity, not just a point-in-time balance. A screenshot may be enough to show that money was available on a certain day, but it does not usually prove where the funds came from. If a checker wants evidence of lawful origin, you need records that connect the money to an identifiable incoming payment or transfer.
An illustrative example is a monthly statement showing your salary landing in Revolut, followed by a transfer to the card or account used for gambling. That is more persuasive than a home-screen balance alone. Your practical checklist is to compare the statement date range, the incoming payment source, and the amount requested. If the numbers do not align, do not guess or edit anything; instead, obtain the correct document from the provider that made the request. The page Revolut gambling block: what it covers is relevant if you also want to understand the limits of payment-blocking tools.
What document consistency looks like in practice
Consistency matters because the reviewer is checking whether the story in your documents makes sense. The name on the account, the date of the incoming money, the amount, and the account used for payment should all fit together. A clear chain is better than a large bundle of unrelated screenshots. If one document says one account and another says a different source, that creates avoidable questions.
A useful checklist is: one name, one time period, one source, one destination. For example, if a Revolut statement shows a transfer from your salary account on Monday and the casino payment happened later that week, the timeline is easy to follow. If the funds came from savings, you may need a longer statement period to show the buildup. This is exactly the kind of practical comparison that fits the broader Guides section and the linked page Revolut vs Starling for casino payments, where account behaviour can matter to compliance checks.
What not to send, and what to check first
Do not send more private information than the requester has asked for, but also do not withhold material that is needed to verify the source. The safest approach is to send the documents requested, with only sensitive details obscured if the request explicitly allows redaction. If the checker has not said what they need, ask for the exact format rather than guessing. That avoids delays and reduces the risk of sending the wrong file.
Do not rely on relabelling, workarounds, or anything that obscures the real origin of the funds. UK rules on credit-card gambling are strict, and the Gambling Commission has made clear that credit-card gambling payments are prohibited, including via intermediaries. If your documents are for a casino, remember that availability of a payment method does not prove a gambling operator will accept it, and it does not say anything about withdrawal speed or promotions. The page Revolut casino free spins: what to check is a reminder that offers and payment checks are separate matters.
If you are unsure, pause and use the support routes
If you cannot show the money trail clearly, stop and check what the requester actually wants before sending anything else. Do not try to bypass a block, a self-exclusion, or an account check. GAMSTOP is the multi-operator self-exclusion scheme for online gambling in Great Britain, and bank blocks plus blocking software are meant to complement it. If a source-of-funds request is connected to gambling harm rather than routine verification, it is sensible to step back and seek support.
If you need immediate help or feel at risk, call 999. For gambling support, GamCare runs the National Gambling Helpline on 0808 8020 133. Use these routes if the checking process is causing stress or if you are worried about control over spending. The safest decision checklist is to ask: can I explain the funds honestly, can I prove them with records, and do I need support before proceeding? If the answer to any of those is no, get help first.
Frequently asked questions
Is a Revolut balance screenshot enough for source-of-funds checks?
Usually not on its own. A screenshot only shows a balance at one moment. A statement or transaction record is better because it shows where the money came from and how it entered the account.
What is the simplest document consistency check to do first?
Check that the name, date, amount, and source all match across your documents. If the story does not line up, get the correct statement or payment record before sending anything.
Should I hide private details before sending documents?
Only if the requester says redaction is acceptable. If they have not given guidance, ask for the exact format they need. Do not omit information that is necessary to verify the lawful origin of funds.
Does having money in Revolut prove it is acceptable for gambling checks?
No. A balance alone does not prove the origin of the funds. The reviewer may still ask for statements, transfer records, or another paper trail showing how the money was obtained.
What should I do if the request feels linked to a gambling problem?
Pause and do not try to bypass any block or exclusion. GAMSTOP, bank blocks, and support services are there to help. If you need urgent help, call 999; for support, contact GamCare.